Research · Space Waste
RESEARCH · SPACE WASTE
Research
Published work, the open research agenda, and the engineering principles behind South Star PROX-M18, our RPODU (Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, Docking & Undocking) unit in development. We read the literature so the hardware doesn't have to learn it the hard way.
SW-TR-001 Rev B · Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking
An engineering assessment for active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, from approach through capture to takeover. NASA NESC lessons from DARPA Orbital Express, AR&D sensor heritage, attitude-sensing research, and post-capture takeover control. 14 pages.
DOWNLOAD PDF .DOCXSW-TR-002 · The Last Ten Meters
Terminal-phase disturbances, plume impingement, and approach safety architecture. Built on NASA-JSC's CFD/DSMC plume modeling practice (EMPIRE lineage) and the ISS partnership's IRSIS corridor/abort standard. Its central inversion: the act of approaching disturbs the thing being approached. 7 pages.
DOWNLOAD PDFTopics adjacent to the published reports. Every card links to a primary source. COVERED = treated in a published report. OPEN = targeted for future work.
Uncooperative RPO in practice: ADRAS-J
Astroscale's ADRAS-J (2024) rendezvoused with a real 3-ton H-2A upper stage using angles-only navigation, held 50 m fly-arounds, and closed to 15 m, the first proximity characterization of unprepared debris. The definitive validation case for SW-TR-001.
SOURCE: ASTROSCALE MISSION PAGE → OPEN · HIGH PRIORITYVision-based pose estimation & the domain gap
Stanford SLAB's SPEED/SPEED+ benchmarks expose the core ML problem: models trained on synthetic imagery degrade on real hardware-in-the-loop images (sunlamp glare, lightbox noise, Earth background). What spaceflight-qualified inference actually requires.
SOURCE: SPEED+ · ARXIV 2110.03101 → OPEN · HIGH PRIORITYNet & tether-net capture dynamics
RemoveDEBRIS flew the first in-orbit net capture (2018); ESA's e.Deorbit program built the simulation methodology for nets wrapping rigid tumbling targets. Deployment parameters, capture quality indices, tether damping: the physics behind our net-capture pillar.
SOURCE: REMOVEDEBRIS · EOPORTAL → COVERED · SW-TR-002The last ten meters: plume impingement & corridors
NASA-JSC's CFD/DSMC plume chain and flight-rule practice; IRSIS corridor, hold, and abort architecture; the debris inversion, where impingement torque perturbs the target's tumble exactly when margins are thinnest. Now a published report.
READ: SW-TR-002 (PDF) → OPENDetumble before capture
Contactless trade space: eddy-current braking (the ‘Eddy Brake’ studied for Ariane rocket bodies), propellant-free magnetic-pulse brake-and-traction, electrostatic detumble of GEO objects. Controllability of the chaser-target magnetic interaction is the open question.
SOURCE: ACTA ASTRONAUTICA → OPENSensor ghosts near large reflective bodies
Laser and RF returns multipath off 11-meter metal cylinders: real return plus ghost reflections, the proximity-ops version of ground-bounce interference. Test methodology against reflective mockups; gating treatment sketched in SW-TR-002 §6.
RELATED: NTRS 20120017923 → OPENProgram watch: open-source intelligence
China's Shijian-21 towed defunct Beidou-2 G2 past graveyard orbit (2022); SJ-21/SJ-25 performed the first GEO satellite-to-satellite refueling (July 2025). ClearSpace-1 and DARPA RSGS continue in parallel. A standing review of open OOS literature, always citing originals.
SOURCE: SPACENEWS → OPENVerification: predicted vs. measured
Air-bearing testbeds, hardware-in-the-loop campaigns, best-estimated trajectories (NESC R-2), and the prediction-vs-flight ledger kept from the first lab test onward. Credibility is the documented gap between model and measurement.
CONTEXT: SW-TR-001 §7 (PDF) → COVERED · SW-TR-001Attitude sensing chain
Star-tracker/camera misalignment and active laser metrology; all-day star+Sun sensing from one aperture via oversaturated pixel response; magnetometer-free magnetic control. SW-TR-001 §3.
READ: SW-TR-001 (PDF) → COVERED · SW-TR-001Post-capture takeover & inertia identification
Single-sample iterative inertia identification, Lyapunov takeover control, torque allocation; LiDAR-seeded estimation for debris; tether-tension identification. SW-TR-001 §8.
READ: SW-TR-001 (PDF) → OPEN · HIGH PRIORITYUnintended emission in protected bands
A Curtin/ICRAR survey (Grigg, Tingay & Sokolowski, A&A 2025) logged 112,534 unintended emissions from 1,806 Starlink satellites, present in up to ~30% of low-frequency images and inside bands reserved for radio astronomy, outside the ITU's intentional-transmission rules. The measurement case for ground-based interference work.
SOURCE: A&A 699:A307 · ARXIV 2506.02831 → OPENBlind interference cancellation
Kratos SigX Protect cancels an interfering signal using equipment only on the receiving end, with no prior knowledge of the source, by characterizing it and generating a canceling signal in real time. The receive-side approach behind active interference cancellation.
SOURCE: KRATOS SIGX → OPENDistributed low-cost spectrum sensing
Electrosense+ and SatNOGS prove the pattern: inexpensive software-defined-radio nodes, on-device feature extraction, a shared backend and a public database, a planet-scale observatory built from dispersed antennas. The blueprint for a sensing minimum-viable network.
SOURCE: ELECTROSENSE+ · ARXIV 1811.12265 → OPENMachine learning for RF: detection & classification
Deep-learning spectrum sensing recovers signals that energy detection misses; CNN-based classifiers separate licit signals, flag spoofed ones, and detect signals in unknown, dynamic spectrum environments. The characterization engine, and a bridge to the orbital pose and guidance work.
SOURCE: DEEP LEARNING FOR RF · ARXIV 1909.11800 →Old aerospace and defense literature keeps solving our problems before we have them. A reading of declassified and archival NASA, MITRE, Army Research Laboratory, and CIA documents, mapped to where each applies in the Space Waste program.
| Source | What it established | Where we apply it |
|---|---|---|
| MITRE flight-simulation study | Declared its modeling assumptions up front (a local tangent-plane frame, valid over short ranges); aircraft tracking a planned route, altitude and speed profile; faster-than-real-time execution | Approach-corridor guidance with a reference trajectory to correct against; accelerated-time simulation for AI training at scale |
| NASA linear-model derivations (1987–88) | Derive the vehicle math once, rigorously; distribute as a shared software tool | One canonical relative-dynamics library for the whole program, with no parallel re-derivations |
| Damaged-aircraft control study | Controlling an aircraft whose mass properties change suddenly mid-flight | Transfers almost directly to the moment of capture: sudden attachment of tumbling mass (SW-TR-001 §8) |
| Wind-shear landing studies | The final seconds dominate the risk; model terminal disturbances explicitly | The disturbance budget of SW-TR-002 §6: plume reflections and target wobble modeled, not margined |
| Minimum-time-climb study | Solve the simplified problem first; use it to seed the full solution | Warm-start trajectory optimizers and RL planners with the analytic answer instead of learning orbital mechanics from scratch |
| SR-71 performance validation | Predict, fly, then explain every prediction-vs-flight discrepancy | The predicted-vs-measured ledger, kept from first bench test onward |
| ARL ground-wave propagation | Direct signal plus ground reflection interfere at the receiver | Lidar/radar ghost returns near large reflective rocket bodies; mandates testing against reflective mockups |
| ARL beacon-navigation study | Position and orientation from beacons mounted on the target | The cooperative half of the business: where to advise satellite builders to mount fiducials and retroreflectors for serviceability |
| Artillery fire-control manual | Baseline solution plus separately tabulated, individually tested corrections | Guidance architecture: clean baseline plus auditable correction terms, reviewable piece by piece by defense customers (SW-TR-002 §6) |
| NASA airship study | Don't claim superiority everywhere; define the missions where competitors structurally fail | Positioning: small debris and tumbling derelicts are missions nobody else's architecture serves |
| CIA foreign-literature translations | Reading what adversaries publish openly is the cheapest intelligence; every document traceable to an archive ID | The Program Watch agenda item; citation discipline across all Space Waste publications |
Distilled from the flight-test and fire-control literature above. These are the habits we hold our own engineering to. SW-TR-002 opens with a declared-assumptions block, Principle 01 in practice.
The report series grows with its source library. Documents we are actively seeking:
- ADRAS-J mission results and GN&C papers (Astroscale/JAXA CRD2, 2024–25): angles-only navigation, fly-around design, 15 m approach
- SPEED+ / SPEC challenge papers (Stanford SLAB; arXiv 2110.03101) and follow-on pose-estimation work across the synthetic-to-real domain gap
- RemoveDEBRIS flight results (net + harpoon experiments, 2018–19) and e.Deorbit net-dynamics simulation studies
- Plume impingement for proximity ops: NASA EMPIRE high-fidelity simulations (NTRS 20120017923), DSMC thruster-plume methods, ISS visiting-vehicle plume requirements; IRSIS rendezvous interoperability standard
- Contactless detumble: ‘Eddy Brake’ control analyses (Agora / Ariane rocket-body studies), magnetic-pulse brake-and-traction, electrostatic detumble of GEO objects
- Air-bearing / HIL RPOD testbed methodology papers; best-estimated-trajectory reconstruction practice
- Clohessy-Wiltshire / relative-motion guidance under uncertainty; passively safe trajectory design
- Damaged-aircraft / control-reconfiguration literature after sudden mass-property change: directly transferable to post-capture takeover
- Open literature on Shijian-21 / SJ-25 GEO operations, ClearSpace-1, DARPA RSGS, for the Program Watch file
- DSMC / plume-target interaction studies for lightweight tumbling bodies: the SW-TR-002 §5 gap
- RF geolocation by time-difference-of-arrival (HawkEye 360 RFGeo methodology and accuracy studies); adaptive-array and spatial-nulling references
- Kratos SigX Protect technical notes; blind-separation and receive-side cancellation methods
- Electrosense / SatNOGS network-architecture papers: distributed low-cost SDR sensing, shared backends, public databases
- RF machine learning: automatic modulation classification, RFI excision, GAN-based transmitter identification, cyclostationary plus neural-network jammer detection
- Starlink unintended-emission follow-on measurements affecting SKA-Low and LOFAR; ITU regulatory discussion of unintended emission